PATRICK J. MADDEN
C h o o s e your o w n b a c k g r o u n d color!
|
JUDGE PATRICK J. MADDEN
I. Judge Madden Assists in Concealing Evidence
Don complained to Judge Madden that DA Lipske claims 'evidence' used against him at trial is now somehow 'missing'. Because the court is required by law to retain evidence for 75-years, Don wrote to Judge Madden to complain about all his evidence being 'lost', but the judge refused to respond to this formal complaint. Don needs this evidence to prove it is false so wrote to circuit court clerk, Virginia Giacomino, to ask for her opinion as to how the evidence was lost. She answered by advising Don that the evidence is not missing, but is in the court's files. By failing to answer Don's complaint or produce the evidence that was there in his own files, Judge Madden assisted DA Lipske in concealing important evidence and assisted DA Lipske in a lie.
II. Judge Madden Protecting and Concealing Criminal Activity
Don gathered together much evidence proving that Connie Vargovich committed the crimes of perjury, false swearing and obstruction, and that DA Lipske suborned perjury and knowingly used perjury to convict Don. Under Wisconsin law, when a person has 'reason to believe' someone committed crime, he/she may petition for a 'John Doe' crime inquiry hearing to present evidence and call witnesses to testify. Don petitioned for the hearing, and, because it is mandated by law, Judge Madden set a date for the hearing. But, after another prosecutor admitted Connie lied at trial and Don had presented a lot of evidence proving crime was committed by DA Lipske and Connie Vargovich, Judge Madden changed his mind and now decided to not hold the crime inquiry hearing.
· Click here to see the 'John Doe' Petition Don filed in the court which contains facts and law that require Judge Madden to conduct a hearing so Don can present evidence of crime and call witnesses to testify.
· Click here to see Judge Madden change his mind a year later and refuse to hold the required hearing after Don presented incontrovertible evidence of crime and after a special prosecutor had admitted that Connie lied. |
|
III. Public Records Containing Evidence of Crime Being Concealed Wisconsin law requires that public records be made available for inspection. Certain public records kept by Sheriff Bruneau prove Don's accuser lied, that police concealed evidence and information favorable to Don, and that DA Lipske knowingly used perjury at trial. By refusing to answer Don's request for access to the records, the sheriff is violating law. Don's remedy was to petition the court to compel these records. Don did petition Judge Madden to compel the sheriff to turn over the requested public records and informed the judge that the records are evidence of perjury and crimes committed against him. Instead of ordering these records as required by law, Judge Madden called Don a 'harasser without legal purpose' and denied Don's petition. To assist the sheriff with concealing evidence favorable to Don's defense, Judge Madden violated well established Wisconsin law. IV. Judge Commits Federal Crime by Denying Don's Court Access
Don attempted to file additional legal pleadings and petitions with the court but the court clerk, Karen Ransanichi, returned Don's pleadings with a letter advising Don that Judge Madden ordered her not to file his paperwork. Don wrote again to inform the court that he has a constitutional right to access the court and litigate his case. That letter also came back unopened, marked "Refused, return to sender." Don again sent petitions to the court but these, too, came back unopened, marked "Refused, return to sender." Don's mother then sent a certified letter to Judge Madden advising him that Don has a constitutional right to access the court and that denying access to a court is a federal crime. That letter was also rejected by Judge Madden. It was marked "Refused, returned to sender." Judge Madden has repeatedly committed federal crime by obstructing access to a court and ordered his clerk to commit federal crime. |
|
V. Investigation Uncovers Judge Madden's Motive for Perverting Justice
Because it is clear that something is seriously wrong with Judge Madden's handling of this case, Don set out to find out why the judge commits crime, denies rights, treats Don unfairly, and denies justice Don so clearly deserves. Don started a website to publish facts and evidence in his case and obtained a professional investigator. The website informed the community of corruption and intentional perversion of justice by Iron County officials. Witnesses began coming forward to reveal that Judge Madden and Don's girlfriend/false accuser, Connie Vargovich, were socially-sexually involved for years, even behind Don's back while she was living with Don! The investigator has interviewed witnesses concerning that relationship. Other females came forward to reveal that Judge Madden offered them 'judicial favors' in exchange for sex! This disgusting information has been turned over to state-federal law enforcement.
It is now clear that Judge Madden is consistently acting criminally in order provide his girlfriend, Connie Vargovich, with the 'judicial favor' of railroading Don and denying him justice. Moreover, by failing to recuse himself from Don's case and by failing to fully inform Don on record before trial of the fact, nature and duration of his involvement with Connie, Judge Madden has committed fraud and denied Don's critical constitutional right to a neutral and unbiased judge.
· Click here to see the investigator's report concerning his interview of witness N.A.
Click here to see (and hear) the investigator's interview of witness M.A. VI. Judge Madden Does Not Deny Facts or Evidence Against Him
Don has given Judge Madden every opportunity in the book to begin acting like a judge rather than a criminal, and gave him every opportunity to address evidence against him to either deny or admit it. Don pointed out to Judge Madden that, under Wisconsin law, failing to deny or refute is an admission that it is true. Judge Madden has not denied any fact or evidence against him. He knows that, if he tried, he would be caught in additional lies. Note the June 1 st, 2006 letter that Don sent to Judge Madden. If anything in that letter was not true, Judge Madden would charge Don with contempt. But he didn't do that. He knows that if he did, Don would simply demand a jury trial and prove it all true.
|